Difference between revisions of "Thursday March 5th, 2015"

From Planteome.org
Jump to: navigation, search
(D. Update from AISO/BisQue group- Justin Preece:)
(F. Position Paper or "White Paper")
Line 82: Line 82:
 
* Oregon State University Advertisement: posted on various sites: http://aspb.site-ym.com/networking/apply_now.aspx?view=2&id=276580
 
* Oregon State University Advertisement: posted on various sites: http://aspb.site-ym.com/networking/apply_now.aspx?view=2&id=276580
  
== F. Position Paper or "White Paper" ==
+
==Other Comments==
* In order to state our plans and cultivate our ideas, we should move quickly to produce a Position Paper or "White Paper".
+
DWS:  Comments from colleagues at NYU, on the GO and how it does not really tell you too much in reality. Ideally the Planteome will link the genes and functions and processes, to the final outcome of the plant development and plant structures.
* We do not want to lose out on ideas and concepts that we have proposed- others may take the credit and publish it first
+
* Suggestion is to do more links between the GO and PO- knowledge is there, but has not been exploited.  Moving into plant development and the traits
* We should put forward our plans and stance, and what we expect to produce, rather than discussing it later in the project
+
* Example shown by PJ- network graph, that shows the link genes, functions and processes, to the final outcome of the plant development and plant structures.
* Possible places: Plant Methods, Nature Plants, Nature Methods, New Phytologist
+
* Sun gear type diagrams
* Will help us crystallize our ideas, goals and plans
+
 
+
Goals:
+
* Build a community consensus on widespread acceptance and availability, invite discussions
+
* Define the vocabularies and terms such as phenotypes, etc
+
* What level of phenotypes are we looking at: molecular aspects, function, processes, location, etc
+
* Any evaluated characteristic of an entity can considered a phenotype
+

Revision as of 17:16, 16 March 2015

Who: EA, LC, JE, JP Not available: PJ, BS, GG, EZ, ST

Link to recording: File:AllHands 3-5-15.mp4

A. General Comments and Updates:

  • Schedule for Monthly All-Hands meetings

- We will do a new doodle poll- LC

  • Planteome Wiki page has been set up with password protection (if you are reading this, it must be working :-))

From last meeting...

  • PJ will circulate final version of the proposal in a cleaned-up format

- EA- It would be very useful to have a copy of the 'official abstract' to share with partners or colleagues. See link to award on NSF site: http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1340112

- LC will send EA the NSF logos to use with the announcement on the Crop Ontology page

  • Progress on opening new Planteome-related positions in the Jaiswal Lab (software developer, curator)-

- position is open, being advertised on various sites: Planteome blog, ASPB Careers

C. Update from IT group- Data Store, AmiGO2, Justin Elser:

- It currently just has a standard set of ontologies and a small subset of annotations.

- To navigate: go to http://dev.planteome.org/amigo/search/ontology

  • Note: I was unable to get it to load with the ncbi taxon ontology like GO has because the loading program ran out of memory.

Possibly amy be better to just load a branch of the NCBI taxonomy, for the plants- we do not really need the whole thing.

  • Next steps are to work on the theming and to clean up the list of the ontologies:

Currently, this is the list of ontologies that are loaded:

AmiGO2 Planteome dev.png

Links:

  • Priority for us will be refining the list of the ontologies: Do not need the following:
    • Mouse_ontology
    • adult_mouse_anatomy
  • Need to include the Trait Ontology
  • Also need to check on the versions of the ontologies being loaded from the purls above- may be able to modify to use our verisons.
  • Load time for the ontologies is about 2 hours and the test set of annotations loaded in a few minutes.
  • JE is working with Chris Sullivan to figure out a way to be able to do the load from one of the compute nodes in the cluster as they have much more RAM.
  • For more information, please see the notes at: Data_storage_and_AmiGO2_Working_Group

D. Update from AISO/BisQue group- Justin Preece:

  • Bisque (http://bioimage.ucsb.edu/bisque) is the Image Annotation (IA) of iPlant, and is the platform we will be using for the Planteome
  • Last group meeting was Feb 12th, Image_Annotation_Working_Group_Meetings
  • Setting up development environment for the two graduate students who work with Sinisa
  • Starting to work on the IA modules with in Bisque
  • Bisque has some aspects of segmentation, but it is limited, compared to the AISO desktop tool
  • Initial focus is to build a basic user interface that allows single segmentation input- it sends it out to the Bisque server and returns a segmented image. Not interactive- done over the network
  • Bisque lacks the software architecture to do interactive segmentation, over the network.
  • Bisque developers are working on a more synchronous interactive mode (independent of our project)
  • Draft doc of the specs is linked to the wiki page.

E. Update from Ontologies Working group:

Who is involved: EA, BS, DWS, LC, PJ, others TBA

  • Next meeting is Friday Mar 6th, 2015 8:30am PST (GMT-8)

Update on Position advertisements:

  • Crop Ontology position is closed, interviews are March 19-20th

Other Comments

DWS: Comments from colleagues at NYU, on the GO and how it does not really tell you too much in reality. Ideally the Planteome will link the genes and functions and processes, to the final outcome of the plant development and plant structures.

  • Suggestion is to do more links between the GO and PO- knowledge is there, but has not been exploited. Moving into plant development and the traits
  • Example shown by PJ- network graph, that shows the link genes, functions and processes, to the final outcome of the plant development and plant structures.
  • Sun gear type diagrams