Oct 11th, 2016 Ontology Working Group Meeting: Difference between revisions

From Planteome.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:


=Agenda=
=Agenda=
==spine root terms for PO==




==lenticel question for PO==


==New Taxon constraints added to PO==
==New Taxon constraints added to PO==
Line 36: Line 38:


* The other was is to use "X only_in_taxon (Y OR Z)", but this needs to be tested....
* The other was is to use "X only_in_taxon (Y OR Z)", but this needs to be tested....
* Suggestion: maybe we should be using the in_taxon relation, rather than the only_in_taxon relation


== Suggest adding a new relation between the morphology trait and a quality trait ==  
== Suggest adding a new relation between the morphology trait and a quality trait ==  

Revision as of 16:36, 11 October 2016

Planteome Ontology WG Zoom Meeting

  • Date: Tuesday Oct 11th, 2016
  • Time: 8:15am PDT (GMT-7)
  • Connection details: Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/620296847
  • Attendees:
  • Regrets: PJ, DWS, EA

Recordings:

Agenda

spine root terms for PO

lenticel question for PO

New Taxon constraints added to PO

  • Prototype taxon constraints have been added to the plant Ontology
  • This will be an area where the botanical expertise of the NYBG group will be very helpful
  • Currently:
    • whole plant (PO:0000003): only_in_taxon NCBITaxon:33090 Viridiplantae {source="cjm"}
    • plant ovary (PO:0000004): only_in_taxon NCBITaxon:3398 Magnoliophyta {source="GO:0035670"}
    • microspore (PO:0020048):
  • microspores are present in at least 5 different taxa (flowering plants, gymnosperms, some of the ferns, selaginella, and isoetes). Those taxa don’t have a common ancestor.
    • DWS: Only, Marsilea, Regnellidium, Pilularia, Azolla, and Salvinia in the ferns. A monophyletic group comprised of two families, Marsiliaceae (the first three genera) and Salvinaceae (the last two genera).

How to deal with the ones that are in more than one taxa (that do not have a common ancestor)- two ways:

  • In GO they name taxon unions (CM: but these are a real pain)
    • id: GO:0009766
    • name: primary charge separation
    • namespace: biological_process
    • def: "In the photosynthetic reaction centers, primary charge separation is initiated by the excitation of a molecule followed by the transfer of an electron to an electron acceptor molecule following energy transfer from light harvesting complexes." [ISBN:0792361431]
    • is_a: GO:0022904 ! respiratory electron transport chain
    • relationship: only_in_taxon NCBITaxon_Union:0000007 {id="GOTAX:0000169"} ! Viridiplantae or Bacteria or Euglenozoa
    • relationship: part_of GO:0019684 ! photosynthesis, light reaction
  • The other was is to use "X only_in_taxon (Y OR Z)", but this needs to be tested....
  • Suggestion: maybe we should be using the in_taxon relation, rather than the only_in_taxon relation


Suggest adding a new relation between the morphology trait and a quality trait

Many of these are currently is_a children resulting in dual parentage, we also have some that are part_of, but this is technically not correct

e.g. pericarp texture (TO:0002623):

  • is_a pericarp morphology trait (TO:0000945)
  • is_a fruit quality trait (TO:0002728)

Harmonization between TO and PO

  • In TO, the classes 'fruit weight' and 'kernel weight' exist. How to harmonize that?
  • Options:
  1. Add the fruit types to the PO as separate terms
  2. Keep only 'fruit weight' in the TO, and then 'kernel weight' will become a synonym of 'fruit weight'
  3. Keep 'fruit weight' in the TO and move 'kernel weight' to appropriate the Crop Ontologies and then these can be imported in TO. The CO class 'kernel weight' will use the same design pattern as 'fruit weight' with a taxon constraint.
  4. Use the fields: subClassOf instead of equivalentClass for the design pattern (DP) when narrow synonyms


  • Related question: should all the CO classes have a taxon constraint? Or only the classes with a species-specific entity (i.e. synonyms narrow or broad) should have one?

CO mappings

  • Eight crops have been mapped to TO so far: lentil, cassava, wheat and rice are part of the current Planteome release 1.0
  • New crops added: sweet potato, maize, soybean and pigeonpea


  • Statistics are available here: [[1]]
  • Attempt of a visualization: [[2]] (avoid this if you have ocean sickness!). Feedback is welcome


Redirect from old Plant Ontology Site

Upcoming Meetings and Workshops

IC-FOODS Conference November 7-9,2016 Davis, California

4th International Plant Phenotyping Symposium, CIMMYT, December 13 – 15, 2016

Plant and Animal Genome 2017, Jan 14-18, 2017, San Diego, CA, USA

http://www.intlpag.org/

  • October 31 early registration deadline
  • Deadline for workshop abstract submissions is December 2, 2016.
  • Deadline for changes to program (posting speakers) is November 30, 2016
  • Poster Abstracts Submission Deadline is October 28, 2016

Phenome 2017, Feb 10th to 14th, 2017

http://www.phenome2017.org/#homepage

  • DWS will attend- evo devo presentation
  • CM will attend and present Planteome and pheno-BLASTing

Biocuration 2017, March 23-26, 2017

  • Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States
  • http://biocuration2017.org
  • Call for Workshops:
    • Submission deadline: November 11, 2016
    • Submission email: biocuration2017@lists.stanford.edu
  • Biocuration 2017 will bring together hundreds of leading curation scientists, bioinformaticians, and developers from all over the world to discuss their work, promote collaboration and foster a sense of community in this very active and growing area of research.
  • The purpose of a workshop is to provide an opportunity for participants from academia and industry to present and discuss novel ideas on current and emerging topics relevant to biocuration. Workshops are an excellent forum for exploring emerging approaches and task areas, for bridging the gaps between the curation and technology subfields of biocuration, and for critiquing existing approaches. This is a great opportunity to discuss specific topics with so many colleagues and working scientists gathered in the same location.
  • For the best opportunity for consideration, proposals should be received by November 11, 2016. Please submit a short paragraph (or two) describing the following:
  • Proposed scope and main objective, and their relation to biocuration
  • Brief discussion of why the topic is of particular interest at this time
  • Suggested format (talks, panel discussion, etc.)
  • Potential speakers, panels, or other activities

XIX International Botanical Congress, July 23-29, 2017, Shenzhen, China

Workshop proposal accepted