Oct 11th, 2016 Ontology Working Group Meeting: Difference between revisions

From Planteome.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 50: Line 50:


* Options:  
* Options:  
#  
# Add the fruit types to the PO as separate terms
# Use subClassOf instead of equivalentClass for the design pattern (DP) when narrow synonyms
 
#Keep only 'fruit weight' and then 'kernel weight' will then become a synonym of 'fruit weight'
# Keep only 'fruit weight' in the TO, and then 'kernel weight' will become a synonym of 'fruit weight'
# Keep 'fruit weight' in TO. 'kernel weight' will then be in CO and imported in TO. The CO class 'grain weight' will use the same design pattern than 'fruit weight' + a taxon constraint.  
 
# Keep 'fruit weight' in the TO and move 'kernel weight' to appropriate the Crop Ontologies and then these can be imported in TO.  
The CO class 'kernel weight' will use the same design pattern as 'fruit weight' with a taxon constraint.  
 
# Use the fields: subClassOf instead of equivalentClass for the design pattern (DP) when narrow synonyms
 
Example:


* Related question: should all the CO class have a taxon constraint? or only the classes with a species-specific entity (i.e. synonyms narrow or broad) should have one?
* Related question: should all the CO class have a taxon constraint? or only the classes with a species-specific entity (i.e. synonyms narrow or broad) should have one?

Revision as of 00:50, 11 October 2016

Planteome Ontology WG Zoom Meeting

  • Date: Tuesday Oct 11th, 2016
  • Time: 8:15am PDT (GMT-7)
  • Connection details: Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/620296847
  • Attendees:
  • Regrets:

Recordings:

Agenda

New Taxon constraints added to PO

  • Prototype taxon constraints have been added to the plant Ontology
  • This will be an area where the botanical expertise of the NYBG group will be very helpful
  • Currently:
    • whole plant (PO:0000003): only_in_taxon NCBITaxon:33090 Viridiplantae {source="cjm"}
    • plant ovary (PO:0000004): only_in_taxon NCBITaxon:3398 Magnoliophyta {source="GO:0035670"}
    • microspore (PO:0020048):
  • microspores are present in 5 different taxa (flowering plants, gymnosperms, some of the ferns, selaginella, and isoetes). Those taxa don’t have a common ancestor.

How to deal with the ones that are in more than one taxa (that do not have a common ancestor)- two ways:

  • In GO they name taxon unions (CM: but these are a real pain)
    • id: GO:0009766
    • name: primary charge separation
    • namespace: biological_process
    • def: "In the photosynthetic reaction centers, primary charge separation is initiated by the excitation of a molecule followed by the transfer of an electron to an electron acceptor molecule following energy transfer from light harvesting complexes." [ISBN:0792361431]
    • is_a: GO:0022904 ! respiratory electron transport chain
    • relationship: only_in_taxon NCBITaxon_Union:0000007 {id="GOTAX:0000169"} ! Viridiplantae or Bacteria or Euglenozoa
    • relationship: part_of GO:0019684 ! photosynthesis, light reaction
  • The other was is to use "X only_in_taxon (Y OR Z)", but this needs to be tested....

Suggest adding a new relation between the morphology trait and a quality trait

Many of these are currently is a children resulting in dual parentage

e.g. pericarp texture (TO:0002623):

  • is_a pericarp morphology trait (TO:0000945)
  • is_a fruit quality trait (TO:0002728)

Harmonization between TO and PO

  • In TO, the classes 'fruit weight' and 'kernel weight' exist. How to harmonize that?
  • Options:
  1. Add the fruit types to the PO as separate terms
  1. Keep only 'fruit weight' in the TO, and then 'kernel weight' will become a synonym of 'fruit weight'
  1. Keep 'fruit weight' in the TO and move 'kernel weight' to appropriate the Crop Ontologies and then these can be imported in TO.

The CO class 'kernel weight' will use the same design pattern as 'fruit weight' with a taxon constraint.

  1. Use the fields: subClassOf instead of equivalentClass for the design pattern (DP) when narrow synonyms

Example:

  • Related question: should all the CO class have a taxon constraint? or only the classes with a species-specific entity (i.e. synonyms narrow or broad) should have one?

CO mappings

  • Eight crops have been mapped to TO so far: lentil, cassava, wheat and rice are part of the current Planteome release 1.0
  • New crops added: sweet potato, maize, soybean and pigeonpea


  • Statistics are available here: [[1]]
  • Attempt of a visualization: [[2]] (avoid this if you have ocean sickness!). Feedback is welcome


Redirect from old Plant Ontology Site


Upcoming Meetings and Workshops

IC-FOODS Conference November 7-9,2016 Davis, California

4th International Plant Phenotyping Symposium, CIMMYT, December 13 – 15, 2016

Plant and Animal Genome 2017, Jan 14-18, 2017, San Diego, CA, USA

http://www.intlpag.org/

  • October 31 early registration deadline
  • Deadline for workshop abstract submissions is December 2, 2016.
  • Deadline for changes to program (posting speakers) is November 30, 2016
  • Poster Abstracts Submission Deadline is October 28, 2016

Phenome 2017, Feb 10th to 14th, 2017

http://www.phenome2017.org/#homepage

  • DWS will attend- evo devo presentation
  • CM will attend and present Planteome and pheno-BLASTing

XIX International Botanical Congress, July 23-29, 2017, Shenzhen, China

Workshop proposal accepted

Retrieved from "https://wiki.planteome.org/index.php?title=Oct_11th,_2016_Ontology_Working_Group_Meeting&oldid=3020"