Jan 21st, 2016 Ontology Working Group Meeting: Difference between revisions
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
- figure out what format people want to download data in, allow for download in this format | - figure out what format people want to download data in, allow for download in this format | ||
= Update on browsers= | =Update on browsers= | ||
* Main Planteome website: http://planteome.org/ | * Main Planteome website: http://planteome.org/ | ||
Line 55: | Line 54: | ||
** this is an issues for the Gene Ontology as well | ** this is an issues for the Gene Ontology as well | ||
* Synonym scopes are not being displayed- all the broad, narrow, related and exact synonyms are being lumped together- (https://github.com/Planteome/planteome-ontology-browsers/issues/17) | |||
= | |||
From MAL: | |||
- the CO terms are showing up as subclasses, but they get confused with other things that are subclasses | |||
- they should be 'taxonomic equivalents' | |||
- perhaps you can have double-relationships | |||
- AND subclasses | |||
- perhaps color coding in combination with changing CO_### to the correct | |||
- Need a better way to view trees. Choices now are broken OLSvis, or static .png | |||
- TD will change, but we have a script to auto-update and provide updated CO.owl ontologies (read only) for specific crops | |||
= Upcoming meetings and workshops= | = Upcoming meetings and workshops= |
Revision as of 19:51, 21 January 2016
Planteome Ontology WG Zoom Meeting
- Date: Thursday Jan. 21st, 2016
- Time: 8:15am PST (GMT-8)
- Connection details: Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/757453328
- Attendees: LC, AM, JE, PJ, EA, MAL, BS, GG.
File:Ontology WG Meeting 1-21-2016 video.mp4
File:Ontology WG Meeting 1-21-2016 audio.m4a
Report on PAG 2016
- strong emphasis on high throughput phenotyping, machine learning is hot right now
- data standardization, field scale measurements
- Utilization of ontologies for data annotation
- everyone wants specialized ontologies for THEIR data, not something predefined
- we need to demonstrate how ontologies are useful.
Planteome Collaborators Workshop Monday Jan 11th
- http://planteome.org/outreach/workshops/PAG_2016
- Goals of the Meeting:
- Introduce the Planteome project and launch Planteome 1.0 beta
- Provide an update on the progress of the collaboration with the Crop Ontology to map crop-specific trait dictionaries to the Reference Trait Ontology
- Provide a summary report and overview of the Planteome Curators Workshop, held Nov 2015 in Corvallis, OR
- Engage Planteome collaborators and the plant genomics community by demonstrating use cases of data annotation for rice, cassava and lentils
- Seek engagement of the plant genomics community through tools and applications to integrate into your workflow
- Who attended?
- 29 attendees (link to spreadsheet: Participants list CO-Planteome Meeting PAG 2016)
- Representatives from: CG centers (IITA, CIP, CIMMYT, IRRI) and Bioversity; INRA, IRD, LIRMM, USDA-ARS databases (SoyBase, MaizeGDB, GDR, PeanutBase, LegumeInfo), EBI, Transplant, ELIXIR Consortium, Rothamsted Research.
Comments and feedback
- people are concerned about the GAF2 format
- hopefully will be expanding to more than 16 columns - we will develop standards for conversion TO GAF2
- worry about having people download in GAF2
- need a few use-cases for questions that researchers will be trying to answer.
- figure out what format people want to download data in, allow for download in this format
Update on browsers
- Main Planteome website: http://planteome.org/
- Development site: http://dev.planteome.org/amigo
Issues being sorted out:
- Many of our relations are not being recognized and displayed in AmiGO 2.0 (https://github.com/Planteome/planteome-ontology-browsers/issues/20)
- only showing up- is_a, part_of and occurs_in
- this is an issues for the Gene Ontology as well
- Synonym scopes are not being displayed- all the broad, narrow, related and exact synonyms are being lumped together- (https://github.com/Planteome/planteome-ontology-browsers/issues/17)
= From MAL:
- the CO terms are showing up as subclasses, but they get confused with other things that are subclasses - they should be 'taxonomic equivalents' - perhaps you can have double-relationships - AND subclasses - perhaps color coding in combination with changing CO_### to the correct - Need a better way to view trees. Choices now are broken OLSvis, or static .png - TD will change, but we have a script to auto-update and provide updated CO.owl ontologies (read only) for specific crops